A Need for Further Intergovernmental Program Collaboration

I recently attended a local government meeting in which program team members were warned not to include clients outside the jurisdiction because of funding source restrictions. The funding was from a federal source. The “do-not-share” message was startling to some in the audience, but others understood. Someone had to deliver this administrative message.

At the University of California at Berkeley, I attended a taxation course with Professor George Break of the economics department. One of the concepts in that course was program funding spill-ins and spill-outs; those expenditures that come from other sources or that benefit unintended recipients. Professor Break was clear and convincing that program expenditures do not stop at jurisdictional boundaries. Inevitably, program expenditures for many government programs trickle outside jurisdictional boundaries. Publicly funded programs such as transit, law enforcement, pollution control, environmental services and perhaps hundreds more spill in and out of towns, cities, counties, regions, states and even national boundaries.

So, back to the original question. Do we really have to restrict program services for nonmembers of the intended community? Do we not recognize that administrative efforts to do so, though well intentioned, really defeat our objectives of good intergovernmental relations and perhaps reality? Taken to an absurd level, some jurisdictions recently have sent mentally ill patients across state lines to receive better care. Does this behavior by government forcefully encourage spill-out of services and expenditures?

Now, apply this economic concept to your jurisdiction. With what authority, administrative skills and practice do you resolve this expenditure dilemma? Taking this to the streets: do you instruct your bus drivers not to serve other towns?

Do you prevent social services from serving an adjacent, poorer community? Do you instruct your public safety officers to scale back services to a neighboring jurisdiction? What about the event center, college or hospital that continuously increases traffic in an adjacent jurisdiction?

Submitted by Geoff McLennan


One thought on “A Need for Further Intergovernmental Program Collaboration

  1. You raise a potent point. Under proper leadership which recognize mutual shared interests, intergovernmental collaboration can improve efficiency, effectiveness, and economy for each participating jurisdiction. It could also represent an additional forum to share and transfer best practices. Who wouldn’t want any of that? Old modes of competitive thinking will not address longstanding problems in service delivery, especially when the neighbor literally right across the street may have an existing model for success. Thank you for sharing!

    Liked by 1 person

Tell Us What You Think

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s